Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

Will #MaPoli Go Green in 2018?

Posted on November 3, 2018 by Rob A. DeLeo

While the 2018 election season has been marked by spirited debate over an array of issues, few have garnered more attention from candidates running for office in Massachusetts than the environment and, more specifically, climate change. David Abel of The Boston Globe deemed climate change one of the central topics in the gubernatorial election, adding that “Baker’s record on environmental issues may be the most vulnerable flank in his bid for a second term.”

At the same time, progressive groups across the state have championed environmental policy as a key plank in their agenda. Progressive Massachusetts, for example, endorsed legislation to expand solar power (H. 2706/S. 1846) as well as a proposal to adopt carbon pricing within the state (H. 1726/S. 1821).

And, although he is not currently running for re-election, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh recently announced the city’s most ambitious climate change adaptation program to date, the “Resilient Boston Harbor” plan. The plan includes a myriad of projects aimed at protecting against climate-related flooding, including the restoration of various marshes and beaches, the construction of new seawalls, and the elevation of critical infrastructure.

All signs point to a sincere—and growing—interest in environmental issues within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. But to what extent has this latest strain of environmentalism permeated down-ballot races for positions in the Massachusetts State Legislature? Do environmental issues resonate with state legislative hopefuls? And, if so, what types of environmental issues have these candidates championed on the campaign trail?

Within an eye toward these questions, we content analyzed the campaign websites of candidates for the Massachusetts State Legislature. Since it is obviously far beyond the scope of this blog post to gather data on each-and-every candidate in the state, we only considered the 50 candidates who won a contested primary in September. In total, we sampled 42 House and 8 Senate candidates. Our decision to focus on this cohort was purely a matter of convenience. We previously collected some of this data for a previous blog post on 2018 primary.

We recognize candidate websites are not a particularly strong indicator of policy priorities. There is obviously a big difference between referencing an issue online and shepherding an issue through the institutional pathways of the Massachusetts State Legislature. We harbor no illusions as to the methodological rigor of this post. Our findings need to be taken with a healthy grain of salt.

This said, our analysis reveals some interesting findings, particularly when considered against the backdrop of the larger debate over climate change playing out across the state. Nearly half of the candidates we sampled (46% to be exact) identify climate change as a policy priority, suggesting environmental issues loom large in state legislative races. In fact, this number would have been higher had we expanded the scope of our analysis to include other environmental issues, like wildlife protection and clean oceans, as a number of candidates reference these topics but do not explicitly link them to climate change.

Among those candidates that do express concern about climate change, the overwhelming majority (greater than 82%) cite clean energy and energy efficiency as a priority. A number of members express opposition to the construction of any new gas pipelines, a no doubt salient position among many voters in the wake of the Merrimack explosions. This said, wind and solar power are, without question, the preferred mechanisms for diversifying the state’s energy portfolio. Numerous candidates call for a robust expansion of the solar tax credit while others express interest in making new buildings more energy efficient.

Roughly 26% of the climate-referencing websites highlight the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Given that state environmental groups have doggedly advocated for policy combating motor vehicle emissions, we expected a larger percentage of candidates to express interest in climate change mitigation policy. Even more surprising, we only identified one candidate (Jon Santiago of the 9th Suffolk) who openly advocates for a tax on carbon, which has become the holy grail of environmental policy instruments within progressive circles.

Nor does climate change adaptation appear to be a particularly salient issue among state legislative candidates. Fewer than 18% of the websites we analyzed reference coastal resilience, extreme weather, the various risks associated with protracted heat waves, and other topics related to climate adaptation policy. Among those websites that do reference adaptation, all but one is for a candidate running in a coastal district. This finding is, of course, not surprising, given that coastal flooding is one of the more readily visible consequences of climate change. This said, proponents of increased adaptation funding are behooved to cobble together more robust and diverse constituencies from across the entire state, as ensuring climate resiliency will likely be an incredibly costly endeavor that will require widespread political mobilization.

Moreover, the progressive wave of 2018 has yet to translate into a widespread re-framing of climate change policy as an environmental justice issue. Like adaptation, a relatively small percentage of the candidates (approximately 17%) underscore the distinctive challenges climate change poses to marginalized communities.

In sum, our cursory analysis of state legislative websites indicates the Massachusetts political scene has indeed gone green in 2018, although most of this enthusiasm is directed toward clean energy initiatives. The state is well-positioned to redouble its ongoing efforts to expand wind and solar, however it is less clear whether this renewed interest in environmental issues portends action on other big ticket items, like carbon pricing and climate adaptation. Either way, Tuesday is fixing to be an exciting day for the environmental community.

This post was co-authored by Alex Duarte. Alex is an undergraduate student at Bentley University, where he is majoring in Public Policy and Business Studies.  

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Related

Click HERE to Order
Click HERE to Order

Recent Posts

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC
  • The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Boston Globe Dodges DFER Downfall
  • The Project 2025 America Needs: “The Systematic Organization of Hatreds”
  • Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory

Recent Comments

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC on The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Maurice Cunningham on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Rob Sinsheimer on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Maurice Cunningham on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023
  • Jean Sanders on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018

Categories

  • #SXSWEDU
  • ableism
  • Amos Hostetter
  • Annissa Essaibi George
  • ballot questions
  • Barr Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • Boston Globe
  • Boston Globe Education
  • Boston Herald
  • Boston mayor's race
  • Boston Policy Institute
  • Boston public schools
  • budget
  • campaign finance
  • Cape Cod
  • capital v labor
  • Charles Koch
  • Charlie Baker
  • Chris Rufo
  • Christian nationalism
  • Citizens United
  • Claudine Gay
  • climate change
  • Congress
  • conservatism
  • coronavirus
  • Council for National Policy
  • covid-19
  • dark money
  • Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization
  • democracy
  • Democratic Party
  • Democratic Party presidential nomination
  • Democrats for Education Reform
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Donald Trump
  • Economic Policy
  • education
  • Education Trust
  • Educators for Excellence
  • elections
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • environment
  • Erika Sanzi
  • ExcelinEd
  • Fair Share ballot question
  • Families for Excellent Schools
  • Fiscal Alliance Foundation
  • Fox News
  • Geoff Diehl
  • gun violence
  • Heritage Foundation
  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • impeachment
  • international politics
  • Jim Davis
  • Jim Lyons
  • John Fetterman
  • Jon Keller
  • Jorge Elorza
  • Josh Kraft
  • Keller at Large
  • Kennedy-Markey
  • Keri Rodrigues
  • Keri Rodriguez
  • Koch Brothers
  • Koch Network
  • latin american politics
  • Lawrence Public Schools
  • Lee Corso
  • Liam Kerr
  • local politics
  • MA Senate race
  • marijuana
  • Mary Tamer
  • Mass Opportunity Alliance
  • Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
  • Massachusetts Democratic Party
  • Massachusetts education
  • Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
  • Massachusetts K-12 Statewide Graduation Council
  • Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
  • Massachusetts Parents United
  • Massachusetts Playbook
  • Massachusetts Politics
  • Massachusetts Republican Party
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Massachusetts Third Congessional District
  • Masslive
  • Maura Healey
  • MCAS
  • MCAS ballot question
  • media
  • Media Criticism
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Michelle Wu
  • Moms for Liberty
  • National Parents Union
  • National politics
  • New England Politics
  • New Hampshire Politics
  • Newton public schools
  • Newton Teachers Association
  • Nicole Neily
  • Office of Campaign and Political Finance
  • oligarchy
  • One8 Foundation
  • Parents Defending Education
  • Parents United
  • Paul Craney
  • Pennsylvania Senate
  • Pioneer Institute
  • Police brutality
  • political parties
  • polling
  • presidentialism
  • Priorities for Progress
  • Project 2025
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on 2
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on Two
  • Ranked Choice Voting
  • Republican Party
  • Robert Kraft
  • Ryan Fattman
  • school privatization
  • Secretary Patrick Tutwiler
  • Senator Warren
  • SouthCoast
  • Springfield Republican
  • stroke
  • Students United
  • SuperPACs
  • Supreme Court
  • teachers unions
  • The Politics of Massachusetts Exceptionalism: Perception Meets Reality
  • Tiffany Justice
  • Tina Descovich
  • town meeting
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • unions
  • Voices for Academic Equity
  • voter suppression
  • voting regulations
  • voting rights
  • Walton family
  • Western Mass Politics
  • Your Future
  • Your Future SuperPAC

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by @@MassProfs

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme