Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

Presidential Election 2020: How to Matter in Massachusetts

Posted on September 13, 2019September 13, 2019 by Erin O'Brien

So you watched the debate last night.  You’re pumped.  You cannot wait to vote for one of those folks on the stage.  Or you’re counting the days where you can vote for their opponent.

Cool.  …But you live in Massachusetts.

The peculiarities of the electoral college, as we all know, make a relatively small number of swing states ground zero for turnout-the-vote efforts and political mobilization. Candidate meet-and-greets, phone calls, knocks at the door, emails (requesting more than just money), texts, and free concerts abound – if you are in one of precious states considered viable for either a Democrat or Republican to win come November 2020.  Massachusetts, that ain’t us.

How then can one – red, blue, or otherwise – have political influence in a Presidential contest when, like in Massachusetts, the outcome of the state is foregone conclusion?  I’ve got some ideas.  They are not perfect.  I lived in Virginia, Michigan, and Ohio.  Casting a ballot there is more fun in Presidential years.  But political influence comes in many forms so our electoral college plight need not mean one watches 2020 from the cheap seats.  Here in Massachusetts, personally red or blue, I suggests you:

  1. Give Money. Surprise, surprise.  Give money to the party or presidential candidate you favor.  Money remains the lifeblood of politics and the candidate you favor can definitely use it to help win.
  2. Phone Bank. Not rich?  Maybe that is why you care about politics?  You can phone bank in electorally competitive states from the comfort of your very own couch.  Most Americans, but not all, have cell phones with unlimited calling options or access to a phone that does.  Each major party has lists of persuadable voters, infrequent voters, and others positively inclined towards your preferred party.  Direct contact with an honest to goodness real person still has substantial impact on getting someone to the polls.  Thus, your phone calls can make a difference by getting the persuadables to the polls in those states we will be watching on election night.
  3. Volunteer Where it Matters. Here in MA, our neighbors to the north matter. It is the only time we look enviously to New Hampshire.  NH state went for Clinton by a mere .3% meaning it will be hotly contested by Republicans looking to flip and Democrats looking to hold (and gain).  Take a trip up.  Knock some doors.  Both parties will welcome the help – though no need to flaunt you MA license plates.
  4. Local Party Building. The GOP has been masterful in party-building via local elections.  Sure, school board does not have the same cache as the White House but these local races are places where the electoral college has no bearing.  If you identify as red in a blue state (or vice versa), focusing on “small races” has the advantage of tangible policy outcomes that are immediately felt if one wins and, just as importantly, building a party infrastructure is vital for changing a state from solidly blue or solidly red to purple.  The long game is arduous but the Republican party has shown how it pays dividends.
  5. Be Visible. If you are a proud republican in MA, put the sign out for Trump, Weld, or Sanford.  Slap a bumper sticker on your car.  Contagion effects are real – visual reminder that everyone isn’t blue can help motivate like-minded others and subtly remind the Dems not to go too far.  By the same token, if you’re blue wear it proud.  This reminds that public sentiment in MA is strongly in your camp and that you expect state and local delegations to legislate accordingly.
  6. Pick a Cause. Issues matter in Presidential elections.  Working to raise the profile, or salience, of a favored cause helps put that item on the agenda when voters in battleground states decide.  When women’s rights or healthcare are at the top of a voter’s brain, Dems do better.  Traditionally, by contrast, when foreign policy questions are at the fore Republicans have an edge.  Focusing on one specific issue area you are passionate about, like the environment or guns, can help assure this issue is one the Presidential candidates must also place in the fore.  Give your money supporting this cause so that those organizations can run ads and social media around it.  Post on the issue yourself – your facebook and twitter have legs far beyond the Bay States.  Raising the profile of the issue in these ways makes it more likely that voters in the states that tip the balance center it for their own voter calculus.

Would it be more fun if we could do all of the above as well as have more spring in our step when we cast a 2020 ballot?  Sure.  Do I want a free Bon Jovi concert (true story – that’s what I want) down the street as a part of GOTV efforts?  Yup.  They aren’t coming.  But this Presidential election is as consequential as it gets.  Not living in an electoral battleground state is no excuse to not go all in on the race.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Related

Click HERE to Order
Click HERE to Order

Recent Posts

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC
  • The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Boston Globe Dodges DFER Downfall
  • The Project 2025 America Needs: “The Systematic Organization of Hatreds”
  • Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory

Recent Comments

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC on The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Maurice Cunningham on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Rob Sinsheimer on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Maurice Cunningham on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023
  • Jean Sanders on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018

Categories

  • #SXSWEDU
  • ableism
  • Amos Hostetter
  • Annissa Essaibi George
  • ballot questions
  • Barr Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • Boston Globe
  • Boston Globe Education
  • Boston Herald
  • Boston mayor's race
  • Boston Policy Institute
  • Boston public schools
  • budget
  • campaign finance
  • Cape Cod
  • capital v labor
  • Charles Koch
  • Charlie Baker
  • Chris Rufo
  • Christian nationalism
  • Citizens United
  • Claudine Gay
  • climate change
  • Congress
  • conservatism
  • coronavirus
  • Council for National Policy
  • covid-19
  • dark money
  • Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization
  • democracy
  • Democratic Party
  • Democratic Party presidential nomination
  • Democrats for Education Reform
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Donald Trump
  • Economic Policy
  • education
  • Education Trust
  • Educators for Excellence
  • elections
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • environment
  • Erika Sanzi
  • ExcelinEd
  • Fair Share ballot question
  • Families for Excellent Schools
  • Fiscal Alliance Foundation
  • Fox News
  • Geoff Diehl
  • gun violence
  • Heritage Foundation
  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • impeachment
  • international politics
  • Jim Davis
  • Jim Lyons
  • John Fetterman
  • Jon Keller
  • Jorge Elorza
  • Josh Kraft
  • Keller at Large
  • Kennedy-Markey
  • Keri Rodrigues
  • Keri Rodriguez
  • Koch Brothers
  • Koch Network
  • latin american politics
  • Lawrence Public Schools
  • Lee Corso
  • Liam Kerr
  • local politics
  • MA Senate race
  • marijuana
  • Mary Tamer
  • Mass Opportunity Alliance
  • Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
  • Massachusetts Democratic Party
  • Massachusetts education
  • Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
  • Massachusetts K-12 Statewide Graduation Council
  • Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
  • Massachusetts Parents United
  • Massachusetts Playbook
  • Massachusetts Politics
  • Massachusetts Republican Party
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Massachusetts Third Congessional District
  • Masslive
  • Maura Healey
  • MCAS
  • MCAS ballot question
  • media
  • Media Criticism
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Michelle Wu
  • Moms for Liberty
  • National Parents Union
  • National politics
  • New England Politics
  • New Hampshire Politics
  • Newton public schools
  • Newton Teachers Association
  • Nicole Neily
  • Office of Campaign and Political Finance
  • oligarchy
  • One8 Foundation
  • Parents Defending Education
  • Parents United
  • Paul Craney
  • Pennsylvania Senate
  • Pioneer Institute
  • Police brutality
  • political parties
  • polling
  • presidentialism
  • Priorities for Progress
  • Project 2025
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on 2
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on Two
  • Ranked Choice Voting
  • Republican Party
  • Robert Kraft
  • Ryan Fattman
  • school privatization
  • Secretary Patrick Tutwiler
  • Senator Warren
  • SouthCoast
  • Springfield Republican
  • stroke
  • Students United
  • SuperPACs
  • Supreme Court
  • teachers unions
  • The Politics of Massachusetts Exceptionalism: Perception Meets Reality
  • Tiffany Justice
  • Tina Descovich
  • town meeting
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • unions
  • Voices for Academic Equity
  • voter suppression
  • voting regulations
  • voting rights
  • Walton family
  • Western Mass Politics
  • Your Future
  • Your Future SuperPAC

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by @@MassProfs

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme