Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

Why Omitting Climate Change from Last Night’s Debate is a Bigger Deal Than You Think

Posted on October 16, 2019 by Rob A. DeLeo

Last night’s Democratic presidential debate ended without a single question—not one—about climate change. The omission has already drawn the ire of a number of presidential hopefuls, including Julian Castro and Tom Steyer who questioned why CNN and The New York Times, the debate’s two host organizations, overlooked such a vitally important issue.

To be fair, a number of candidates attempted to shoehorn climate change into discussions about other topics, like the economy, impeachment, and even Ellen’s friendship with Former President George W. Bush. Yet in the absence of a specific climate change question, candidates were unable to articulate their vision for addressing an issue that has consistently ranked among the top priorities for likely Democratic voters.

Last night’s debate is a red flag for anyone with even a remote interest in reversing the catastrophic effects of climate change. Unlike many of the other topics discussed—health care, foreign relations, the impeachment inquiry, the Supreme Court—a fairly sizable cohort of voters and, worse yet, elected officials likely see climate change as a temporally remote issue. This does not mean they think climate change is a hoax, but that they are not particularly concerned that it will have an overly negative impact on their lives in the immediate future. As such, climate change is much more susceptible to fading from public and policymaker consciousness, as least until the next major hurricane, drought, or wildfire event triggers yet another fleeting moment of alarmed rediscovery.

CNN appeared to be cognizant of this dilemma when it sponsored a seven-hour Climate Crisis Town Hall back in September. The Town Hall, which was widely applauded by the environmental community, provided a historic opportunity for candidates to articulate their climate plans. However, a one-off event will not suffice, especially since the viewership for town halls tends to pale in comparison to the actual debates. Instead, voters need to be consistently reminded of the urgency of this issue each and every time the candidates step on stage.

More alarming, last night’s debate suggests climate change remains, at best, a tertiary issue in the eyes of the mainstream media. This does not bode well for future policy change given that the media plays an instrumental role in helping to set the government agenda. If the media does not talk about climate change, then politicians are unlikely to concern themselves with climate change once they take office. This is especially true at the national level where the winning party is lucky to pass one—maybe two—signature pieces of legislation during a president’s first term in office. It is hard to imagine any of the current candidates prioritizing an issue that does not make it onto the short list of questions for a primary debate.

Nor should voters be confident that the Democratic Party will somehow fill the attention void left by the media. In November 2017, Robinson Meyer of The Atlantic called the Democrats “shockingly unprepared to fight climate change,” noting that the party lacked any sort of comprehensive plan to address the issue. While the recent climate renaissance is no doubt a welcome development for the environmental community, the sudden uptick in interest should be considered tenuous at best. It is imperative that the party use primary debates to crystallize climate change on the Democratic platform and provide voters with an opportunity to vet competing proposals.

The biggest loser of last night’s debate was not Tulsi Gabbard or Joe Biden or any other member of the Democratic Party for that matter. The biggest loser from last night’s debate was climate change, thanks in large part to sloppy preparation on the part of CNN and The New York Times. Democratic leaders need to act swiftly to address the fallout from last night’s debacle by demanding that at least one climate change question be included in all future debates.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Related

1 thought on “Why Omitting Climate Change from Last Night’s Debate is a Bigger Deal Than You Think”

  1. Jorge says:
    October 16, 2019 at 2:19 pm

    Thank you Mr DeLeo for pointing out the elephant in the room . Hopefully climate change will one day be more important than divisive tweets that get the clicks.

Comments are closed.

Click HERE to Order
Click HERE to Order

Recent Posts

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC
  • The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Boston Globe Dodges DFER Downfall
  • The Project 2025 America Needs: “The Systematic Organization of Hatreds”
  • Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory

Recent Comments

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC on The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Maurice Cunningham on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Rob Sinsheimer on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Maurice Cunningham on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023
  • Jean Sanders on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018

Categories

  • #SXSWEDU
  • ableism
  • Amos Hostetter
  • Annissa Essaibi George
  • ballot questions
  • Barr Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • Boston Globe
  • Boston Globe Education
  • Boston Herald
  • Boston mayor's race
  • Boston Policy Institute
  • Boston public schools
  • budget
  • campaign finance
  • Cape Cod
  • capital v labor
  • Charles Koch
  • Charlie Baker
  • Chris Rufo
  • Christian nationalism
  • Citizens United
  • Claudine Gay
  • climate change
  • Congress
  • conservatism
  • coronavirus
  • Council for National Policy
  • covid-19
  • dark money
  • Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization
  • democracy
  • Democratic Party
  • Democratic Party presidential nomination
  • Democrats for Education Reform
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Donald Trump
  • Economic Policy
  • education
  • Education Trust
  • Educators for Excellence
  • elections
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • environment
  • Erika Sanzi
  • ExcelinEd
  • Fair Share ballot question
  • Families for Excellent Schools
  • Fiscal Alliance Foundation
  • Fox News
  • Geoff Diehl
  • gun violence
  • Heritage Foundation
  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • impeachment
  • international politics
  • Jim Davis
  • Jim Lyons
  • John Fetterman
  • Jon Keller
  • Jorge Elorza
  • Josh Kraft
  • Keller at Large
  • Kennedy-Markey
  • Keri Rodrigues
  • Keri Rodriguez
  • Koch Brothers
  • Koch Network
  • latin american politics
  • Lawrence Public Schools
  • Lee Corso
  • Liam Kerr
  • local politics
  • MA Senate race
  • marijuana
  • Mary Tamer
  • Mass Opportunity Alliance
  • Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
  • Massachusetts Democratic Party
  • Massachusetts education
  • Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
  • Massachusetts K-12 Statewide Graduation Council
  • Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
  • Massachusetts Parents United
  • Massachusetts Playbook
  • Massachusetts Politics
  • Massachusetts Republican Party
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Massachusetts Third Congessional District
  • Masslive
  • Maura Healey
  • MCAS
  • MCAS ballot question
  • media
  • Media Criticism
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Michelle Wu
  • Moms for Liberty
  • National Parents Union
  • National politics
  • New England Politics
  • New Hampshire Politics
  • Newton public schools
  • Newton Teachers Association
  • Nicole Neily
  • Office of Campaign and Political Finance
  • oligarchy
  • One8 Foundation
  • Parents Defending Education
  • Parents United
  • Paul Craney
  • Pennsylvania Senate
  • Pioneer Institute
  • Police brutality
  • political parties
  • polling
  • presidentialism
  • Priorities for Progress
  • Project 2025
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on 2
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on Two
  • Ranked Choice Voting
  • Republican Party
  • Robert Kraft
  • Ryan Fattman
  • school privatization
  • Secretary Patrick Tutwiler
  • Senator Warren
  • SouthCoast
  • Springfield Republican
  • stroke
  • Students United
  • SuperPACs
  • Supreme Court
  • teachers unions
  • The Politics of Massachusetts Exceptionalism: Perception Meets Reality
  • Tiffany Justice
  • Tina Descovich
  • town meeting
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • unions
  • Voices for Academic Equity
  • voter suppression
  • voting regulations
  • voting rights
  • Walton family
  • Western Mass Politics
  • Your Future
  • Your Future SuperPAC

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by @@MassProfs

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme