Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

Twitter’s Suggestions: Evidence of Right Wing Social Media Superiority

Posted on April 6, 2020April 6, 2020 by Jerold Duquette

Last summer I read an interview with Sociologist Jen Schradie about her book, The Revolution That Wasn’t. Schradie’s surprising thesis was that conservatives, not progressives, have become the dominant political activists on the internet. With far greater financial resources and a base much more focused on political power than policy specifics, conservative activists have been able to make much better use of social media than their counterparts on the left.

Yesterday, I stumbled upon what looks like pretty clear evidence of Schradie’s thesis. While helping a teenager set up a Twitter account I was shocked by Twitter’s suggestions for which Twitter accounts this teenager from Massachusetts with a strong interest in politics, government, and science & technology news (included in her just created profile) should consider following. The first twenty politically relevant Twitter accounts suggested by Twitter were as follows:

  1. Kellyanne Conway
  2. Jim Jordan
  3. Ron Desantis
  4. Devin Nunes
  5. Lindsey Graham
  6. Leader McConnell
  7. Michelle Obama
  8. Ben Carson
  9. Rand Paul
  10. Rep Matt Gaetz
  11. Ted Cruz
  12. Ted Cruz
  13. John Barrasso
  14. Doug Collins
  15. Mike Lee
  16. Chuck Grassley
  17. FOX News
  18. CT GOP
  19. Ned Lamont
  20. Barack Obama

I scrolled down for quite a while before finding ANY Democrats presently holding federal office and actually gave up before encountering a mainstream news source. The fact that KellyAnne Conway was #1 on this list ought to make honest people of every political persuasion nauseous. Equally distressing is the fact that the numerous Republicans appearing on this list just happen to be among the most corrupt, dishonest, and least intelligent right wingers in the country.

The perception that progressive activists have used social media to effectively create a powerful national movement has been greatly exaggerated. The reality is that conservatives have created and maintained firm control over their low-information voters and their ideological voters using the internet, while progressives have only been able to rally ideologically progressive voters and activists online, a group that does not include anywhere near a majority of likely Democratic voters. While low information conservative voters can be effectively persuaded and mobilized with symbolic, values-based appeals, average liberal voters demand policy specifics. (Grossman & Hopkins)

The apparent dominance of Bernie Sanders supporting progressives on social media never reflected dominance among Democratic voters. It reflected the news worthiness of progressive social media pronouncements, rhetoric, and arguments, not the sentiments of most Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters. This social media “false positive” of sorts hasn’t gone entirely unnoticed of course. Thoughtful analysts were pointing it out last year, but the most powerful evidence came when the Bernie Sanders internet powered fundraising and organizational juggernaut failed to produce the promised progressive turnout surge in the 2020 Democratic primaries. In fact, Democratic primary turnout has seen increases among more pragmatic, moderate Democratic voters instead. “[B]lack voters, moderates and suburbanites” have turned out in higher numbers to support Joe Biden, not Bernie Sanders.

The persistent belief by Sanders supporters that their candidate’s “revolution” is viable in 2020 is nurtured with cherry picked polling data promoted and disseminated online by progressives. I can tell you from considerable personal experience that evidence and clear explanation of this reality does not move progressives whose steady diet of online progressive propaganda is seemingly impossible to penetrate. Sadly, careful argument and clear evidence is little match for conservative internet trolls and tacticians who have little difficulty helping progressives nurture their delusions of grandeur. Right wing disinformation disseminators goad progressives online with all manner of technical and rhetorical manipulation.

Bottom line: Progressives and mainstream liberal Democrats need to wake up to the huge advantage that Republicans and conservative activists have online. Not even the giant gap between Bernie Sanders’ social media enthusiasm and his performance in primary elections will convert his diehard supporters. Only a much more concerted effort by Democrats to organize and mobilize Biden supporters online can blunt the Republicans online advantage and the counter-productive progressive agitation being fueled by the far left and right in the run up to the 2020 elections.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Related

Click HERE to Order
Click HERE to Order

Recent Posts

  • Massachusetts Board of Higher Education Betrays Working Class Students
  • Announcement: Sinister Interest and Evil in Every Shape Is With Us
  • The Globe Editorial Board Can’t Stop Getting the Legislative Audit Question Wrong
  • DiZoglio’s Case is Built for the Court of Public Opinion, Not a Court of Law.
  • The Auditor Strikes Back!

Recent Comments

  • Craig Rothermel on Charlie Kirk’s Murder and the Danger of Asymmetrical Political Violence Unacknowledged
  • Massandra on Charlie Kirk’s Murder and the Danger of Asymmetrical Political Violence Unacknowledged
  • Craig Rothermel on Charlie Kirk’s Murder and the Danger of Asymmetrical Political Violence Unacknowledged
  • Massandra on Charlie Kirk’s Murder and the Danger of Asymmetrical Political Violence Unacknowledged
  • Craig Rothermel on Charlie Kirk’s Murder and the Danger of Asymmetrical Political Violence Unacknowledged

Archives

  • February 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018

Categories

  • #SXSWEDU
  • ableism
  • Amos Hostetter
  • Annissa Essaibi George
  • ballot questions
  • Barr Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • Boston Globe
  • Boston Globe Education
  • Boston Herald
  • Boston mayor's race
  • Boston Policy Institute
  • Boston public schools
  • budget
  • campaign finance
  • Cape Cod
  • capital v labor
  • Charles Koch
  • Charlie Baker
  • Chris Rufo
  • Christian nationalism
  • Citizens United
  • Claudine Gay
  • climate change
  • Congress
  • conservatism
  • coronavirus
  • Council for National Policy
  • covid-19
  • dark money
  • Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization
  • democracy
  • Democratic Party
  • Democratic Party presidential nomination
  • Democrats for Education Reform
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Donald Trump
  • Economic Policy
  • education
  • Education Trust
  • Educators for Excellence
  • elections
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • environment
  • Erika Sanzi
  • ExcelinEd
  • Fair Share ballot question
  • Families for Excellent Schools
  • Fiscal Alliance Foundation
  • Fox News
  • Geoff Diehl
  • gun violence
  • Heritage Foundation
  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • impeachment
  • international politics
  • Jim Davis
  • Jim Lyons
  • John Fetterman
  • Jon Keller
  • Jorge Elorza
  • Josh Kraft
  • Keller at Large
  • Kennedy-Markey
  • Keri Rodrigues
  • Keri Rodriguez
  • Koch Brothers
  • Koch Network
  • latin american politics
  • Lawrence Public Schools
  • Lee Corso
  • Liam Kerr
  • local politics
  • MA Senate race
  • marijuana
  • Mary Tamer
  • Mass Opportunity Alliance
  • Mass Reads Coalition
  • Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
  • Massachusetts Democratic Party
  • Massachusetts education
  • Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
  • Massachusetts K-12 Statewide Graduation Council
  • Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
  • Massachusetts Parents United
  • Massachusetts Playbook
  • Massachusetts Politics
  • Massachusetts Republican Party
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Massachusetts Third Congessional District
  • Masslive
  • Maura Healey
  • MCAS
  • MCAS ballot question
  • media
  • Media Criticism
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Michelle Wu
  • Moms for Liberty
  • National Parents Union
  • National politics
  • New England Politics
  • New Hampshire Politics
  • Newton public schools
  • Newton Teachers Association
  • Nicole Neily
  • Office of Campaign and Political Finance
  • oligarchy
  • One8 Foundation
  • Parents Defending Education
  • Parents United
  • Paul Craney
  • Pennsylvania Senate
  • Pioneer Institute
  • Police brutality
  • political parties
  • polling
  • presidentialism
  • Priorities for Progress
  • Project 2025
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on 2
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on Two
  • Ranked Choice Voting
  • Republican Party
  • Robert Kraft
  • Ryan Fattman
  • school privatization
  • Science of Reading
  • Secretary Patrick Tutwiler
  • Senator Warren
  • SouthCoast
  • Springfield Republican
  • stroke
  • Students United
  • SuperPACs
  • Supreme Court
  • teachers unions
  • The Politics of Massachusetts Exceptionalism: Perception Meets Reality
  • Tiffany Justice
  • Tina Descovich
  • town meeting
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • unions
  • Voices for Academic Equity
  • voter suppression
  • voting regulations
  • voting rights
  • Walton family
  • Western Mass Politics
  • Your City Your Future
  • Your Future
  • Your Future SuperPAC

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by @@MassProfs

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
 

Loading Comments...