Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
Menu

Matt Gaetz and the Red Popsicle Approach to “Governing”

Posted on October 4, 2023October 4, 2023 by Erin O'Brien

Whaaaa!

That is the sound Representative Matt Gaetz and seven of his colleagues made when they did not get exactly what they wanted from Kevin McCarthy.  The now former Speaker had the audacity to side with the majority of the Republican caucus to raise the debt ceiling in May 2023 (149-71) and again side with the majority of the GOP to avoid a government shutdown last Saturday (126-90). So Gaetz and his gang of merry children did what children do: they pouted. But Speaker McCarthy had already made a mistake many overwhelmed caretakers do: he gave into their unrealistic demands last January and granted any single House member the power to call a vote on his tenure.

So, despite having over ninety percent of his caucus behind him, McCarthy was ousted.

I’ll shed zero tears for Kevin McCarthy as he enabled, and was an active participant in, the very behaviors that threaten foundational processes in American politics.  He became an institutionalist only when facing personal embarrassment.

I will shed a tear for another blow to American institutions and the infantilized expectations of far too many Republican elected leaders (as well as some Dems). Last night’s ouster of McCarthy is but one in a troubling string of actions by Republicans who seem to think that there should be a one-to-one relationship between their policy wants and all governmental outcomes.  They claim to revere the Framers, to practice originalism, but refuse to compromise.  That equation doesn’t balance or, as we say in the Midwest, that dog don’t hunt.  But this logical inconsistency did not begin last night.  The pouters, the my way or the highway crowd, the institutional arsonists have been stoking fires long before McCarthy’s exit:

  • Justice Antonin Scalia passed in February 2016. President Obama’s term had roughly eleven months left.  But Mitch McConnell and the Republicans didn’t “like” that.  So rather than doing what we do in a democracy – sucking it up even when we don’t like the rules – they stoked an ember and refused to give Obama’s SCOTUS pick a hearing.  But when President Trump was in office and Justice Ruth Ginsberg died in September 2020, with the election in November, McConnell and his brethren saw to it that Amy Coney Barrett got a quick hearing and ascended to the highest Court. Ya know, just like the Framers set it up…
  • Former President Trump lost the popular vote and the electoral college in 2020. But he just didn’t like that. And no wonder – no person or party likes losing.  But instead of taking his marbles and going home, he encouraged an insurrection on the People’s House. Gas on flames.
  • Good ‘ol Kevin McCarthy was one of 139 House Republicans who, along with 8 Republican Senators, voted for at least one objection to the electoral vote counts.  They lost the election and that hurts.  But in American politics one respect’s the will of the people even if they disagree with said will.  Not these members of the GOP.  They didn’t get what they wanted, so they voted to light it up.

We are being governed by too many elected officials who wanted the red popsicle, got orange instead, and subsequently decided to melt the entire box in protest.

Importantly, the prior list is far from a complete accounting of where substantial elements of the GOP, including leadership, refuses to abide by the norm of hard-fought compromise.  This isn’t Aaron Sorkining — one need not like each other but one does need to govern.  Hard to do without a Speaker of the House.

American politics is structurally set-up so that incrementalism is the norm – one can thank separation of powers and, to a lesser extent, federalism for that.  But too many in the GOP seem to confuse the process by which we govern with the process by which one’s kitchen renovation gets done.  In the latter, the contractor is beholden to your precise wants.  In American government, however, no one entity and certainly no one person can reasonably expect to get precisely what they want all of the time.  The modern GOP is dealing with precisely this kind of reasoning from too many of its members.  And that’s a threat to democracy.  The call is coming from inside the House, the GOP House.

Last night Rep. Gaetz actually did what I thought was impossible – he united commentary on Fox, CNN, and MSNBC.  His move was so absurd, a neon sign for of a broken set of expectations.  The Republican House caucus may prove ungovernable because too many are unrealistically, and dangerously, entitled.  We’ll see as we wait at least a week – a week! – to get a Speaker of the House.  But let us not think last night was so anomalistic, just the inevitable culmination of personality conflicts between Gaetz and McCarthy.  The Speaker’s ouster was a result of petulant children being enabled so much, expecting nothing less than the red popsicle ever damn time they legislate, that America’s ability to sustain itself hangs in the balance.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Related

Click HERE to Order
Click HERE to Order

Recent Posts

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC
  • The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Boston Globe Dodges DFER Downfall
  • The Project 2025 America Needs: “The Systematic Organization of Hatreds”
  • Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory

Recent Comments

  • Boston Grassroots Leaders Demand Investigation of Josh Kraft Campaign and SuperPAC on The Meaning of Josh Kraft’s “Thanks Dad”* Campaign
  • Maurice Cunningham on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Rob Sinsheimer on Boston Herald, Pioneer Institute, and Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Push Great Replacement Theory
  • Maurice Cunningham on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023
  • Jean Sanders on Banned in Boston (Globe): Walton Family Massachusetts K-12 Political Spending, 2017-2023

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018

Categories

  • #SXSWEDU
  • ableism
  • Amos Hostetter
  • Annissa Essaibi George
  • ballot questions
  • Barr Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • Boston Globe
  • Boston Globe Education
  • Boston Herald
  • Boston mayor's race
  • Boston Policy Institute
  • Boston public schools
  • budget
  • campaign finance
  • Cape Cod
  • capital v labor
  • Charles Koch
  • Charlie Baker
  • Chris Rufo
  • Christian nationalism
  • Citizens United
  • Claudine Gay
  • climate change
  • Congress
  • conservatism
  • coronavirus
  • Council for National Policy
  • covid-19
  • dark money
  • Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization
  • democracy
  • Democratic Party
  • Democratic Party presidential nomination
  • Democrats for Education Reform
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Donald Trump
  • Economic Policy
  • education
  • Education Trust
  • Educators for Excellence
  • elections
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • environment
  • Erika Sanzi
  • ExcelinEd
  • Fair Share ballot question
  • Families for Excellent Schools
  • Fiscal Alliance Foundation
  • Fox News
  • Geoff Diehl
  • gun violence
  • Heritage Foundation
  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • impeachment
  • international politics
  • Jim Davis
  • Jim Lyons
  • John Fetterman
  • Jon Keller
  • Jorge Elorza
  • Josh Kraft
  • Keller at Large
  • Kennedy-Markey
  • Keri Rodrigues
  • Keri Rodriguez
  • Koch Brothers
  • Koch Network
  • latin american politics
  • Lawrence Public Schools
  • Lee Corso
  • Liam Kerr
  • local politics
  • MA Senate race
  • marijuana
  • Mary Tamer
  • Mass Opportunity Alliance
  • Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
  • Massachusetts Democratic Party
  • Massachusetts education
  • Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
  • Massachusetts K-12 Statewide Graduation Council
  • Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
  • Massachusetts Parents United
  • Massachusetts Playbook
  • Massachusetts Politics
  • Massachusetts Republican Party
  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Massachusetts Third Congessional District
  • Masslive
  • Maura Healey
  • MCAS
  • MCAS ballot question
  • media
  • Media Criticism
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Michelle Wu
  • Moms for Liberty
  • National Parents Union
  • National politics
  • New England Politics
  • New Hampshire Politics
  • Newton public schools
  • Newton Teachers Association
  • Nicole Neily
  • Office of Campaign and Political Finance
  • oligarchy
  • One8 Foundation
  • Parents Defending Education
  • Parents United
  • Paul Craney
  • Pennsylvania Senate
  • Pioneer Institute
  • Police brutality
  • political parties
  • polling
  • presidentialism
  • Priorities for Progress
  • Project 2025
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on 2
  • Protect Our Kids Future: No on Two
  • Ranked Choice Voting
  • Republican Party
  • Robert Kraft
  • Ryan Fattman
  • school privatization
  • Secretary Patrick Tutwiler
  • Senator Warren
  • SouthCoast
  • Springfield Republican
  • stroke
  • Students United
  • SuperPACs
  • Supreme Court
  • teachers unions
  • The Politics of Massachusetts Exceptionalism: Perception Meets Reality
  • Tiffany Justice
  • Tina Descovich
  • town meeting
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • unions
  • Voices for Academic Equity
  • voter suppression
  • voting regulations
  • voting rights
  • Walton family
  • Western Mass Politics
  • Your Future
  • Your Future SuperPAC

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by @@MassProfs

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme